Careful! Your new light may not cure your bonding agent. Here’s why ....

(In the beginning there was camphorquinone and halogen lights, and all was good)

by Nelson Gendusa,
DDS Director of Research


Until the early 90’s virtually all light-cure resins used camphorquinone (CQ) as the initiator. When the CQ molecule is hit by photons of certain wavelengths (primarily the blue wavelengths around 460nm), it generates the free radicals that trigger the curing reaction.

Until the early 90’s virtually all curing-lights used a halogen bulb to create these photons. Halogen bulbs generate a relatively broad spectrum that runs from 370nm (deep violet) to 515nm (bluish-green.)

So ... until the ‘90’s curing a restoration was like shooting at a small target with a shotgun. You were certain to score a hit, but you wasted a lot of buckshot in the process.



Fig 1: Think of your curing light as a gun and the initiator in the resin as the target. The halogen light is a "shotgun." It hits the CQ "target" but scatters considerable buckshot around it.


Then about ten years ago two things occurred that individually were brilliant ... but together, created some problems.

Remember, at that time virtually all light-cure composites were using CQ as an initiator. So engineers decided to design a curing light that zeroed in on that small 460nm peak. By shooting bullets (or even lasers) instead of buckshot, these new lights would be less wasteful. They’d cure faster and maybe even produce less heat. The results of this engineering were the plasma arc light, the curing laser and the new diode light.



Fig 2: Touch&Bond's unique initiator puts the target at the other end of the halogen range. As you can see, the same halogen shotgun blast hits both the T&B and CQ target.

 



Fig 3: But lasers, LEDs and most PAC lights aren't shotguns ... They're "rifles" (or maybe in the case of lasers, "rayguns.") They blast the CQ target dead center. And completely miss T&B.

About the same time, the polymer chemists started experimenting with new initiators. There are some limitations to CQ. For example, CQ can restrict the film thickness of a bonding agent. And it can affect the all-important air inhibition layer necessary to bond to the overlying composite. Furthermore, CQ is yellowish, so when it’s used in composite, it can prevent those "whiter-than-white" bleached shades some patients now demand. So the chemists started using initiators other than camphorquinone. They figured that since everybody was using a halogen light with a broad spectral range, they could employ initiators that reacted to a different part of that range. Keeping the shotgun metaphor, fig 2 shows what the chemists were “aiming” for.

But you can see the problem. Just about the time some light manufacturers started shooting bullets, the resin manufacturers moved the target!

And if your light doesn’t generate the proper wavelengths, it doesn’t matter how bright it is or how long you shine it on the restoration. It may look like it’s cured due to the heat of some lights, but it’s not well polymerized.

The moral:

If you use a non-halogen light, you should check whether it’s compatible with any new material you try. This requires two phone calls: First, call the material supplier and ask what it’s “initiation peak” and “curing range” are. Then call your light manufacturer to find out if it hits that target.

To save some of you the calls:
Epic-TMPT composite - Any curing light
Epic-AP composite - Any curing light
TotalBond adhesive cement - Halogen or Apollo with 430 tip
Touch&Bond bonding agent - Halogen only
Brush&Bond bonding agent - Any curing light